Deductive Nonmonotonic Inference Operations: Antitonic Representations
نویسندگان
چکیده
We provide a characterization of those nonmonotonic inference operations C for which C(X) may be described as the set of all logical consequences of X together with some set of additional assumptions S(X) that depends anti-monotonically on X (i.e., X ⊆ Y implies S(Y ) ⊆ S(X)). The operations represented are exactly characterized in terms of properties most of which have been studied in [3]. Similar characterizations of right-absorbing and cumulative operations are also provided. For cumulative operations, our results fit in closely with those of [2]. We then discuss extending finitary operations to infinitary operations in a canonical way and discuss co-compactness properties. Our results provide a satisfactory notion of pseudo-compactness, generalizing to deductive nonmonotonic operations the notion of compactness for monotonic operations. They also provide an alternative, more elegant and more general, proof of the existence of an infinitary deductive extension for any finitary deductive operation (Theorem 7.9 of [3]). This work was partially supported by the Jean and Helene Alfassa fund for research in Artificial Intelligence Mathematics Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904 (Israel) Institute of Computer Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904 (Israel)
منابع مشابه
Contributions to the Theory of Nonmonotonic Inference Systems
In the present paper an approach to nonmonotonic reasoning is discussed which is inspired by the paradigm of abstract model theory. The aim is to analyse non-monotonic reasoning within the framework of inference operations based on model operators. This is done by using the concept of a deductive frame and its semantical counterpart, a semantical frame. These are considered as a basis for nonmo...
متن کاملMental models and nonmonotonic reasoning
Johnson-Laird & Byrne (J-L & B) are equivocal concerning the scope of mental-model theory. On the one hand, they are careful to note that mental models are aimed primarily at explaining deduction, although commonsense inference is not deductive in character. On the other hand, they contend that mental-model theory solves the problem of nonmonotonic reasoning, which is not deductive and is chara...
متن کاملComparative uncertainty, belief functions and accepted beliefs
This paper relates comparative belief structures and a general view of belief management in the setting of deductively closed logical representations of accepted beliefs. We show that the range of compatibility between the classical deductive closure and uncertain reasoning covers precisely the nonmonotonic 'preferential' inference system of Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor and nothing else. In terms...
متن کاملNonmonotonic inference operations
A. Tarski [21] proposed the study of infinitary consequence operations as the central topic of mathematical logic. He considered monotonicity to be a property of all such operations. In this paper, we weaken the monotonicity requirement and consider more general operations, inference operations. These operations describe the nonmonotonic logics both humans and machines seem to be using when inf...
متن کاملA Semantic Approach to Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Inference Operations and Choice
This paper presents a uniform semantic treatment of nonmonotonic inference operations that allow for inferences from infinite sets of premisses. The semantics is formulated in terms of selection functions and is a generalization of the preferential semantics of Shoham (1987), (1988), Kraus, Lehman, and Magidor (1990) and Makinson (1989), (1993). A selection function picks out from a given set o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Log. Comput.
دوره 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1995